Johannesen Ch.4

Dialogical Perspectives

This chapter had a lot of interesting information and perspectives on human communication. The difference between monologue and dialogue is clearly defined by various theorists and writers. I had never considered the differences between the two.

The part that most struck me was the section on dialogue and persuasion. In the beginning of the chapter, I thought that the differences between dialogue and monologue was portrayed rather extremely. Since, in dialogue you are going to be aware of the others ideas, views and interests, how will they be aware of yours? True dialogue seems nearly impossible. The dialogue and persuasion section addressed that an individual may express disagreement or persuade, but still be participating in dialogue.

I agreed with Richard M. Weaver that humans are prone to persuade and be persuaded. That is why commercials, advertisements, and debates are so prominent in our society. I do not think that all persuasion is unethical. Monologue may not be the appropriate way to persuade individuals.

While reading this section I thought of evangelizing Christians. Evangelists persuade people to accept Jesus Christ; this is not usually done in an unethical and objectifying way. God calls us to spread the word, and in discussing our views and explaining our beliefs we are trying to persuade. This does not make it a monologue though. We can listen to the others views to understand what is different and similar in their beliefs.

I thought this chapter had a lot of information that's valuable when analyzing conversations and media. It made me think of the types of conversation I have had with my peers, professors, and family. Have I ever objectified someone in conversation? Have others approached me in monologue? What about public relations, is that an unethical career because of its purpose in persuasion? These are just some of the questions that came to my mind.